Honest comparison

Pick the magnetic designer that fits your project, not your vendor.

MagAI is multi-vendor, license-clean, browser-local, and AI-augmented. It is not the deepest FEM tool on the planet. Below is what each tool wins on — including ours.

Multi-vendor
40+ vendors indexed
Free Tier viable
5 designs/mo with no login
License-clean core
BSD/Apache, GPL only as subprocess
AI-augmented
Narrators · ML ranker · drift detector
MagAI vs REDEXPERT vs Magnetics Inc Designer vs Ansys/JMAG — 12 criteria.
CriterionMagAI DesignerWürth REDEXPERTMagnetics Inc DesignerAnsys Maxwell / JMAG
Price
Free Tier (5/mo) · SME $50
Free
Free
$$$$ (seat license)
Vendor coverage
40+ vendors
Würth only
Magnetics Inc only
Any (you model it)
Login required
No
Yes
Yes (download)
Yes (license server)
Runs offline
Yes (Pyodide)
No
Desktop (phones home)
Yes (heavy desktop)
Topologies covered
11 (6 hard + 5 DSL)
Inductors, basic Tx
Inductors, CM choke
Any (you build it)
Solve time
~0.7 s (analytical)
seconds
seconds
minutes – hours (FEM)
AI assist
Narrators, ML core ranker, trust narrative
No
No
Limited
Trust framework
Public A/B/C grade, 5-component score
Vendor-supplied numbers
Vendor-supplied numbers
User-validated
License cleanliness
BSD / Apache 2.0 core
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Export standards
AAS · JEP30 · SPICE · FEMM Lua · PDF · DXF/STEP
Datasheet PDF
Datasheet PDF
Native + neutral CAD
Privacy / IP
Spec never leaves browser (Pyodide-local)
Cloud
Cloud / phone-home
On-prem (desktop)
Where they win (honest)
FEM depth (we punt to FEMM/Ansys for 3D)
Würth catalog depth + app notes
Magnetics-specific powder-core wizardry
Industry-standard FEM, multiphysics depth

Claims trace to: CLAUDE.md §3 tech stack, §4z engine status, /data/vendor_counts.json live vendor catalog. Have we got something wrong? Tell us.

See it on a design.

Open the LLC 3 kW reference preview — engine-computed output, read-only.

See LLC 3 kW preview Trust grading